One chorus, everywhere you look. “This is the worst market I've ever looked for work in.” A flat declaration of despising the current state of the job market, spelling optional, feeling universal. And the quieter, sadder version — people asking those who were already established in earlier cycles whether moving up used to be… easier.
Let's answer that last one honestly, because the gaslighting on this topic is its own industry: yes. It was easier. People who job-hunted in friendlier cycles played on a lower difficulty setting, and plenty of them have confused that setting with their own skill. If you're struggling now, you are not imagining the difference, and the struggle is not a referendum on you. Cycles are weather. You're allowed to notice it's raining. But “it's raining” is where the useful conversation starts, not ends — because the thing that changed isn't only scarcity, and misdiagnosing it leads straight to the strategy that's currently burning everyone out.
What actually changed: noise, not just jobs
The story everyone tells is “fewer openings, more applicants.” Partly true. But the deeper shift is that the channel collapsed. One-click applying made sending an application nearly free, so everyone sends everything everywhere. Generated resumes and cover letters made each application smoother and more interchangeable at the same time. Companies, drowning, responded with automated screens — software reading software, machines interviewing humans, rejection without evidence a person was ever present. Ghost listings sit open for months collecting resumes for pipelines nobody's hiring from. And every layoff wave drops another cohort of experienced people into the same pool, all clicking the same buttons.
Applying got easier, so applying got worthless. The signal a resume once carried — someone chose to send this here — died when sending stopped costing anything.
What's left is a lottery with excellent production values, and the honest name for most high-volume job searching right now is buying tickets.
The volume game is unwinnable. Stop playing it.
Here's the position, held against most of the advice being handed out: spray-and-pray is dead as a primary strategy, and doubling down on it is how this market eats people. You cannot out-volume a channel where volume is the disease. Machines read applications faster than you can generate them; your umpteenth easy-apply of the day lands in a pile with everyone else's, indistinguishable by design. The players who win lotteries are not the ones who buy the most tickets slightly angrier.
The counter-move is to go where the volume isn't. Noise fills every automated channel — which means scarcity, and therefore signal, now lives entirely in the channels that still cost something: a human reading a specific message from a specific person about specific work.
Practically, that's the narrow-and-deep protocol. Pick a shortlist of companies you actually want — small enough that you can hold each one's context in your head. For each: find the human closest to the pain (the hiring manager, a team member, the founder — not the jobs inbox), and send one short message that could not possibly have been sent to anyone else: “I saw you're hiring for the platform team. I've run exactly the kind of migration your engineering blog says you're mid-way through — here's a short write-up of how I'd approach yours. Worth a conversation?” Never frame the ask as taking their time — frame it as offering something useful.
Attach the proof, not the resume. The write-up, the repo, the teardown of their product's onboarding — an artifact that demonstrates thinking they can use whether or not they hire you. In a channel drowning in identical claims, a small piece of finished relevant work is deafening. A single one of those a day beats a whole afternoon of easy-applies, and — this is the part nobody says — it feels different too. Tickets bought in a lottery leave nothing behind. Artifacts compound.
Measure inputs, not verdicts
The cruellest mechanical property of this market is its feedback loop: effort in, silence out, repeat until the silence starts sounding like a verdict on your worth. You cannot white-knuckle your way through that with morale alone. You need accounting. So move your scoreboard to the things you control:
- Conversations started this week — with humans, not portals.
- Artifacts shipped this week — write-ups, repos, teardowns that exist whether or not anyone replies.
- People who now know you exist — and know what you're good at.
Those numbers respond to effort reliably, which is exactly what a sane scoreboard is for. Offers arrive on the market's schedule; inputs arrive on yours. Judge yourself only on the second kind, and cap the working day while you're at it — the search is a job, and jobs without hour limits break people. An application sent at midnight by someone running on fumes reads like it was.
And when that despair voice asks is it me? — run the check honestly. If your inputs are real (specific messages, real artifacts, live conversations) and the outputs are silence, that's the cycle, not you. The people who came up in easy weather never had to learn the difference. You will know it forever. Grim gift. Still a gift.
The machines are on both sides now
One more feature of this market: the front door of hiring is increasingly automated — screens run by AI, assessments scored by models, interviews conducted by synthetic voices that fire questions with no pauses, no reactions, and a score you never see. Being graded by a black box on tone and confidence with no published rules is the piece of this market nobody's owning up to.
And still, the unfashionable read: AI interviewing will become normal, full stop. Every hour spent litigating whether it should exist is an hour not spent getting good at it. The implementations today are bad — machine-gun pacing, no flow — but bad implementations are learnable, and there's a full playbook in how to prepare for an AI interview. The candidates who treat AI screens as a distinct skill are walking through a door most of the market is still glaring at.
Brutal market, honestly named: more noise than jobs, machines at the gate, weather nobody chose. The move is not more tickets. It's fewer, heavier things — real messages to real humans, artifacts that compound, a scoreboard you control, and deliberate reps against the machines. That's not a guarantee. It's just the only strategy that doesn't require the weather to change first.
Back to all articles